I couldn't find this topic anywhere but I was wondering if anyone had any kind of "behind the scenes" feedback on why it seems like less and less poles are being fitted with cork on their handles. I just seem to prefer the poles that have the full cork handle/butt rather than the foam or the handles that only have  something on the very end of the butt. I have really understood why they have been gravitating towards this production "style". I would automatically assume it would cost less to do the foam with the sectional handle but maybe there is a better explanation. I have been holding off on getting a few rods because they have this partial handle/foam set up and im kinda bummed honestly. 

welcome to the Y2K!!  cheaper for them.....expensiver for us! 

damnit...
I know that there are companies that still use them but im not ready to shell out hundreds of dollars for a rod, I seem to put mine through
 pretty rigorous wear and tear. I cant do it yet. I want to...but I cant lol

Shimano clarus, full cork, great blank, good price

Atta boy. I like your style.
How you been brother?

I'm trying out the Daiwa rods for salmon this year full cork. from Broadway Bait Tackle.. I like how light that thing is! as light as the lamiglass xcel I have with split cork handle.

It seems to me like the quality of cork is slipping a little, too. The cork on my newish Lamiglass Classic Glass is already looking a little thrashed from my rod holder...

Might add some of that heat shrink rubber grip to it to prolong the life a bit.

Lol, throws 3/4 ounce about 200 feet and 1ounce flys 240 feet (actual measured average of 3 casts).